COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Posts specific to the 3.0 litre NA H6 engine

Re: COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Postby Tradewind » Mon Sep 16, 2013 8:51 pm

Robbks wrote:I owned a Legacy GT (with GT-B Engine and ECU fitted)
It had two turbo's
It was almost 150kg lighter than my 3RB
And was still slower.. :D

But now we're at 150,000km, most H6's are in better nick that the 2.5 GT's getting around
would be interesting to see a % of owners (2.5T vs 3.0) who's needed to do head gaskets and/ or big ends.


Thats a pretty fair comment, I got a few kms on mine and the motor in a mechanical sense is as new, runs like new and zero oil consumption. More than 100 000km left in it easy which would make 250 000km. I do have an annoying headgasket but it runs perfectly otherwise
2015 Liberty 3.6R (6GEN) - Raptor headers and Raptor SUPER MAF
Tradewind
 
Posts: 2040
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 3:00 pm
Location: Gordonvale Qld
Car: Grey MY15 6GEN 3.6R - Raptor MAF
Real name: Tim

Re: COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Postby Ric » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:31 pm

I've only just come across this topic.
I've left most of it intact, but the last few posts were just muck raking, and I've removed them.
User avatar
Ric
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6479
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:08 pm
Location: Melbourne
Car: OLD: MY06 3RB Wagon NEW: MY21 Outbck
Real name: Ric
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=12

Re: COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Postby Shakibsaifi » Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:59 pm

Wow this thread hahaha xD
User avatar
Shakibsaifi
 
Posts: 302
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 11:44 pm
Location: Arndell Park, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Car: MY04 WRX
Real name: Shakib
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=24959&p=357443#p357443

Previous

Return to 3.0R & 3.6R engine specific

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests