COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Posts specific to the 3.0 litre NA H6 engine

Re: COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Postby dr20t » Sun Sep 15, 2013 12:13 pm

You needed to row through four gears to get to 100kph?

And yes I have an auto that I manually change - :roll:
Addicted to corn juice....

My FrankenStien build thread here: viewtopic.php?t=14137
User avatar
dr20t
 
Posts: 4191
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:43 pm
Location: South West Sydney NSW
Car: 04 Liberty GT Auto
Real name: Mick
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?t=14137

Re: COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Postby RX25SE » Sun Sep 15, 2013 12:27 pm

dr20t wrote:You needed to row through four gears to get to 100kph?


I was looking at this also.

Pretty sure 100kph in my 3.0RB is the bottom/middle of 3rd.

Purely for research purposes, I might go for a drive later. :)
User avatar
RX25SE
 
Posts: 847
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 8:43 am
Location: Melbourne
Car: MY07 30RB 6sp Wag

Re: COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Postby alessandro132 » Sun Sep 15, 2013 12:31 pm

RX25SE wrote:Purely for research purposes, I might go for a drive later. :)


:lol:
TEAM TOYOTA | TEAM HKS

Cusco, HPI, HKS, and a few other bits...
User avatar
alessandro132
-stickered-
 
Posts: 2380
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:40 am
Location: Sydney
Car: 2000 JZX100 Toyota Chaser Tourer V
Real name: Al
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16914

Re: COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Postby peadya100 » Sun Sep 15, 2013 12:33 pm

SIMBAT wrote:
Ok, so when you said the hsv had 20k under the hood you were just exaggerating. As 330rwkw is achievable for 3-4k in a hsv.


No exaggeration stock was 265rwkw he changed the intake, billet manifold, cams, pushrods, crank shaft and pistons because he has plans to supercharge in the future and wanted his engine to have no weak points. 65rwkw gain after a tune and 20 grand worh of parts and labour he hadn't touched the exhaust at that time. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMKUUUvjjzo


Well im sorry to say they were HUGELY ripped off on parts and labour. My friend has a VE SS with a 2.3L blower, cams, intake etc and that was far less than 20k. But anyway thats beside the point. I guess the simplest thing to look at is 0-100 times. Although the 3.0r is similar peak power to the GT its slower to 100. Pretty clear cut comparison.
Diamond Works SI-DRIVE Covers - Subaru Liberty/Legacy MY07 to MY09

https://www.facebook...aruDiamondWorks
subaru.diamondworks@gmail.com
User avatar
peadya100
-stickered-
 
Posts: 2243
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:21 pm
Location: Norah Head, Central Coast
Car: 2007 Liberty GT-B Wagon
Real name: Adam
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=21072

Re: COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Postby SIMBAT » Sun Sep 15, 2013 12:41 pm

dr20t wrote:You needed to row through four gears to get to 100kph?

And yes I have an auto that I manually change - :roll:


Only an auto driver would have to be that dumb seriously... where did i say i went into forth? i changed from 1st to 2nd to 3rd and unless you have a ferrari don't delude yourself that changing gears in an auto is anything like driving a manual. You must be a bit slow in the head to say that.
my12 VW Tiguan TDI-tuned
my16 Hyper Blue WRX STI
my16 Honda Jazz VTI
User avatar
SIMBAT
 
Posts: 424
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 8:14 pm
Location: north east Melbourne suburbs
Real name: the dream tiger

Re: COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Postby SIMBAT » Sun Sep 15, 2013 12:58 pm


Well im sorry to say they were HUGELY ripped off on parts and labour. My friend has a VE SS with a 2.3L blower, cams, intake etc and that was far less than 20k. But anyway thats beside the point. I guess the simplest thing to look at is 0-100 times. Although the 3.0r is similar peak power to the GT its slower to 100. Pretty clear cut comparison.


Well go ask a mechanic how much it would cost to replace pushrods on a 6.2 GEN3 V8, you'll shit your pants then ad $400 per pushrod. I'm aware on paper a GT has quicker 0-100 times.

It's quite sad how this topic has changed from what it was intended on, first we had some smart ass telling me if i changed at 6grand on the test drive it would be quicker, everyone here is so full of irrelevant bullshit. Also looks like no understands how much slower hsv's are then our cars in motorkana events. Last year i was beating any HSV and FPV by 2 seconds on the haunted hills hill-climb track(dry), and that was with a NA EJ25i 2002 Liberty RX Manual, But I was half a second slower then a 2004 WRX wagon. numbers don't mean anything unless your on the drag strip.
my12 VW Tiguan TDI-tuned
my16 Hyper Blue WRX STI
my16 Honda Jazz VTI
User avatar
SIMBAT
 
Posts: 424
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 8:14 pm
Location: north east Melbourne suburbs
Real name: the dream tiger

Re: COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Postby kiahatsiu » Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:01 pm

Oh boy.
Kinda flush. Fitment is something. ADM as F*ck.
User avatar
kiahatsiu
 
Posts: 1799
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:09 pm
Location: Brisbane
Car: Silver 05 GT Wagon
Real name: Ian

Re: COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Postby dr20t » Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:10 pm

SIMBAT wrote:
dr20t wrote:You needed to row through four gears to get to 100kph?

And yes I have an auto that I manually change - :roll:


Only an auto driver would have to be that dumb seriously... where did i say i went into forth? i changed from 1st to 2nd to 3rd and unless you have a ferrari don't delude yourself that changing gears in an auto is anything like driving a manual. You must be a bit slow in the head to say that.


:mrgreen:

I love the Internet

Ferrari's are easy targets unless they're the open wheel, open cockpit carbon type
;)
Addicted to corn juice....

My FrankenStien build thread here: viewtopic.php?t=14137
User avatar
dr20t
 
Posts: 4191
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:43 pm
Location: South West Sydney NSW
Car: 04 Liberty GT Auto
Real name: Mick
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?t=14137

Re: COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Postby fibble » Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:23 pm

dr20t wrote:
SIMBAT wrote:
dr20t wrote:You needed to row through four gears to get to 100kph?

And yes I have an auto that I manually change - :roll:


Only an auto driver would have to be that dumb seriously... where did i say i went into forth? i changed from 1st to 2nd to 3rd and unless you have a ferrari don't delude yourself that changing gears in an auto is anything like driving a manual. You must be a bit slow in the head to say that.


:mrgreen:

I love the Internet

Ferrari's are easy targets unless they're the open wheel, open cockpit carbon type
;)


I can see this is becoming one of those "passion of youth" vs "dark twisted sarcassm of old age" kind of debates....... :P :D
fibble
 
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:58 pm
Location: Melbourne
Car: GT
Real name: Fab

Re: COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Postby SIMBAT » Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:26 pm


:mrgreen:

I love the Internet

Ferrari's are easy targets unless they're the open wheel, open cockpit carbon type
;)


you should buy a camry... that is all
my12 VW Tiguan TDI-tuned
my16 Hyper Blue WRX STI
my16 Honda Jazz VTI
User avatar
SIMBAT
 
Posts: 424
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 8:14 pm
Location: north east Melbourne suburbs
Real name: the dream tiger

Re: COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Postby fibble » Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:31 pm

SIMBAT wrote:

:mrgreen:

I love the Internet

Ferrari's are easy targets unless they're the open wheel, open cockpit carbon type
;)


you should buy a camry... that is all


Oooooohhhh Camry!!!

http://www.toyotanation.com/forum/107-c ... ble-7.html
fibble
 
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:58 pm
Location: Melbourne
Car: GT
Real name: Fab

Re: COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Postby kiahatsiu » Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:14 pm

Ric, please note I am being restrained.

Newmate: the vf46 is a fairly subdued turbo. All over by 5500 as people have said. That being said the gt you drove sounds like it had issues. Stock GTs go quite well.
Kinda flush. Fitment is something. ADM as F*ck.
User avatar
kiahatsiu
 
Posts: 1799
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:09 pm
Location: Brisbane
Car: Silver 05 GT Wagon
Real name: Ian

Re: COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Postby DownUnder » Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:45 pm

SIMBAT wrote:No exaggeration stock was 265rwkw he changed the intake, billet manifold, cams, pushrods, crank shaft and pistons because he has plans to supercharge in the future and wanted his engine to have no weak points. 65rwkw gain after a tune and 20 grand worh of parts and labour he hadn't touched the exhaust at that time. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMKUUUvjjzo


If you're legit with that last link you're starting to sound a lot like this guy... viewtopic.php?f=21&t=20919
TOM

2004 MY04 2.5i Liberty Wagon (5MT)
User avatar
DownUnder
 
Posts: 244
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:23 pm
Location: Adelaide, SA
Car: 2004 MY04 Liberty 2.5i Wagon Manual
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=24070

Re: COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Postby KiDo_Tuning » Sun Sep 15, 2013 5:52 pm

SIMBAT wrote:
Are you sure you will understand the Excel data sheet? Ever wonder why 3rd gear in a turbo car is referred to as the 'fastest'? It is because in 2nd gear, your lucky to see full boost in a stock LGT, let alone get to 6psi. Suddenly 14psi in 3rd gear at 3000rpm seems like a good idea 8)



Well to satisfy my own curiosity sine we were talking about changing at 6000rpm for both the 3.0R and a GT. I was in the outer norther suburbs of melbourne this morning where they have 100k straight flat country roads. i have an app on my phone which records true 0-100 times with gps. I did 4 runs, the only way i could ensure an exact take off for all the runs was to just take of normally (no dropping of the clutch). After i did each run i went back and did the others on the exact same stretch of road. i did 2 runs changing gears at 6000rpm since a few of you have insisted not revving a stock car past that, then i did 2 runs to the limiter. here are my times

run one changing at 6000rpm= 7.223----note for both gear changes (1st to 2nd and 2nd to 3rd) were performed at 6000rpm
run two changing at limiter= 7.006
run three changing at 6000rpm= 7.198----note only 2nd to 3rd were performed at 6000rpm, 1st to 2nd were performed at limiter
run four changing at limiter=6.979
My car is a 2008 3.0R B-spec manual with 57000kms just has the rear mufflers deleted with 1 3/4" stainless steel pipes, k+n panel filter no tune as of yet.

If someone can do the same in a stock GT??? (by stock i mean no tune)


Stock tune shuts the electronic throttle above peak power on a H6 :)

A totally stock H6(no intake or diff back mods) is slower than a GT. Do the same rear muff delete and panel filter in a GT and it will walk away from you.

Learning View_SS_D2UH001M_2013-04-07 13 08 10.jpg
Learning View_SS_D2UH001M_2013-04-07 13 08 10.jpg (83.39 KiB) Viewed 3067 times

Considering the stock 07 H6 rattles/pings so badly on the stock tune, I would not be thrashing it above 6000rpm
KiDo Racing Tunes Info: HERE

Great minds discuss ideas;
Average minds discuss events;
Small minds discuss people
User avatar
KiDo_Tuning
 
Posts: 2801
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:53 pm
Car: Subarus + Nissans
Real name: Matt

Re: COMPARE THE PAIR 3.0R vs GT

Postby KiDo_Tuning » Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:03 pm

SIMBAT wrote:Well go ask a mechanic how much it would cost to replace pushrods on a 6.2 GEN3 V8, you'll shit your pants then ad $400 per pushrod. I'm aware on paper a GT has quicker 0-100 times.

It's quite sad how this topic has changed from what it was intended on, first we had some smart ass telling me if i changed at 6grand on the test drive it would be quicker, everyone here is so full of irrelevant bullshit. Also looks like no understands how much slower hsv's are then our cars in motorkana events. Last year i was beating any HSV and FPV by 2 seconds on the haunted hills hill-climb track(dry), and that was with a NA EJ25i 2002 Liberty RX Manual, But I was half a second slower then a 2004 WRX wagon. numbers don't mean anything unless your on the drag strip.


$400 per pushrod? Wolverine Adamantium material?
http://www.speedinc.com/shop-by-vehicle ... -sets.html
Pushrod pricing from some of the best in the business...

I can do pushrods in an LS3 in under 2 hours. Remove rocker covers, remove rockers, remove pushrods, intall new pushrods, fit rocker cover. To put that into perspective I could fit a cam, valvesprings, roller rockers and pushrods in under 7 hours with engine in the car and less out of the car :)

I bought an entire LS3 416ci stroker delivered to my door with an E85 2000Hp crank horsepower rating with WARRANTY for under $10K from the same company in the USA :)
KiDo Racing Tunes Info: HERE

Great minds discuss ideas;
Average minds discuss events;
Small minds discuss people
User avatar
KiDo_Tuning
 
Posts: 2801
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:53 pm
Car: Subarus + Nissans
Real name: Matt

PreviousNext

Return to 3.0R & 3.6R engine specific

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests