Hey Mark,
Thanks for the heads up and sorry to hear about the problems you've been experiencing. Hopefully, they can be sorted with minimum fuss.
I'm wrapped about the generated feedback though and makes you think twice.
bosc0 wrote:It would be a great idea to make sure you look after members that are trusted amongst community. If you don't, things will go downhill faster then a bricked ECU.
cruisn wrote:Hey Des,
I had nothing but adulation for Matt on the initial tune, it was perfect IMO.
But once theres an issue and the back up service is non existant or even a simple response to you messages doesnt happen, one starts to wonder.
It really seems he's just in it for the initial cash grab......
WheelieBin wrote:cruisn wrote:Hey Des,
I had nothing but adulation for Matt on the initial tune, it was perfect IMO.
But once theres an issue and the back up service is non existant or even a simple response to you messages doesnt happen, one starts to wonder.
It really seems he's just in it for the initial cash grab......
Have you heard from him since? I got an email with a revision last night. Managed to kill my battery last night (luckily not while writing to the ECU) so I haven't really given it any proper testing yet, but drove into the city this morning for an onsite and it seemed OK... in rush hour traffic.... at somewhere between 20 - 40km/h
WheelieBin wrote:Have you heard from him since?
cruisn wrote:Erratic tunes and zero communication when something is wrong.
Tunes to what he thinks is best, not to what you actually ask for.
I had a near miss accident when my car went into limp when pulling into flowing 70km/h traffic. I was only on half throttle, didnt even floor it.....
PM'd Matt, PM has been read, no response.
Very poor form, although he was happy to take the money.
cruisn wrote:WheelieBin wrote:Have you heard from him since?
Not a word......
I guess he hopes the issues will just go away if he ignores them.
And to think I was adamant about giving him $50 on the retune for his time.....
Boostaddict wrote:
I am finding some surging issues that seem to go away with a battery disconnect and maf clean. Then rear up some 1-2 weeks later!!![]()
norbs wrote:Mark. Have you compared the ROMs? You can see what has been changed.
We suspect it has something to do with throttle maps or boost maps.
KiDo_Tuning wrote:norbs wrote:Mark. Have you compared the ROMs? You can see what has been changed.
We suspect it has something to do with throttle maps or boost maps.
The early LGT 2.0L got a LOT of revisions from Subaru as they also had the P0607 in some cars(Factory Service Bulletin) so for example, A2WD010T had a revision, A2WD011T and then a subsequent revision, A2WD012T. I loaded the latest A2WD012T ROM as Subaru reportedly fixed issues. I have sent through the original ROM but in tuned form.
Mark/CRUISN's car also had factory revisions, 4 in fact. His is still on the factory ROM image, no ROM update was applied. Since his was the 'last' of the updates from factory.
bass_straitener wrote:KiDo_Tuning wrote:
The early LGT 2.0L got a LOT of revisions from Subaru as they also had the P0607 in some cars(Factory Service Bulletin) so for example, A2WD010T had a revision, A2WD011T and then a subsequent revision, A2WD012T. I loaded the latest A2WD012T ROM as Subaru reportedly fixed issues. I have sent through the original ROM but in tuned form.
Mark/CRUISN's car also had factory revisions, 4 in fact. His is still on the factory ROM image, no ROM update was applied. Since his was the 'last' of the updates from factory.
How do you explain why this is happening only after you've tuned them? A lot of these cars have been running fine with their ECU's not being revised by Subaru but seem to start throwing CELs once tuned. Mark's car (cruisn), Tony's car(ynot87) and Zach etc..
Perhaps your tune is reverting back Subaru fixes for P0607?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests