SH30RB wrote:hks180 wrote:Well done Mick !!!
When do we get to see 1/4 mile times of your beast Leo?
I reckon Leo would crack a high 11 off the bat!
SH30RB wrote:hks180 wrote:Well done Mick !!!
When do we get to see 1/4 mile times of your beast Leo?
dr20t wrote:Thanks guys much appreciated
Didn't end up beating the 12.21. Only had three runs 12.46 and 12.61 were the other times.
Best mph was 109.8, and it's still boost cutting before the line at 6000rpm, so I know for a fact it's got another 0.2 in it to get to 12.00 or 11.9XXX
Taking the best of all the time slips, it would do 1.74 60ft, 7.8 to 1/8, 110mph and 11.9 something.
Not going back anytime soon but maybe once some more minor tweaks can be made (eliminate fourth gear boost cut or raise it and less wheelspin off the line).
For now I'm happy with the results
Goes to show the work phat / garage 88 / matt (kido tuning) can weave
We have some great resources at our disposal guys - mick's knowledge of the little things are what make the difference and I can't wait to get my 2.5 build done (collaboration between garage 88 and me).
Mick
<GB> wrote:Was this tuned remotely on the road or on the dyno?
dr20t wrote:On a down note, I went outside to check my car is all ok earlier
My Sti centre cap is gone from the left rear wheel!!
Mustn't have liked 3200rpm launches
Anyone got a tip where I can get one from?
Mick
dr20t wrote:SH30RB wrote:hks180 wrote:Well done Mick !!!
When do we get to see 1/4 mile times of your beast Leo?
I reckon Leo would crack a high 11 off the bat!
KiDo_Tuning wrote:<GB> wrote:Was this tuned remotely on the road or on the dyno?
My first 'base tune' made 207kw on pump fuel running less boost than before
Rome_STI wrote:I posted Mick's time on the legacygt forums to start some discussion. They were suss about Matt's tuning and didn't think it was legit. They were mentioning things like he plays around with the numbers to make the cars "feel" like they shift crisper and quicker without any actual benefit. Mick's time down the quarter mile proves this wrong.
Also, interesting to note that Mick's time is 4th fastest on the legacygt all time fastest list...
<GB> wrote:Rome_STI wrote:I posted Mick's time on the legacygt forums to start some discussion. They were suss about Matt's tuning and didn't think it was legit. They were mentioning things like he plays around with the numbers to make the cars "feel" like they shift crisper and quicker without any actual benefit. Mick's time down the quarter mile proves this wrong.
Also, interesting to note that Mick's time is 4th fastest on the legacygt all time fastest list...
mustnt be many fast libertys/legacys over their
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests