dr20t wrote:Fuck I love your work Mick, drunk or not.
Let's talk more about these when I see you next.
Mick
Sorry Mick i think i just hammered your thread/???
dr20t wrote:Fuck I love your work Mick, drunk or not.
Let's talk more about these when I see you next.
Mick

PHAT GT wrote:chaotic2050 wrote:I think PHAT is drunk!![]()
Taking a page or 50 from my book
no as im still spelling words right.....i think???
but i can crack open a bottle of JD
i have 3 liberty's here , 1 QLD ,1 ACT and a SYD lib so i must be doing somthing right
kiahatsiu wrote:Well, it has been about one week since I undertook any modification to my Liberty, so I guess it is time to start looking at cams. As it sits the setup comes on well at around 3.5k, but seems to run out stomp up top. So, I am thinking a set of 264ish 10.somethingish cams, some ID1000s and another day on the dyno might be the go.
Phat, or anyone who is in the know, do the liberty motors have smaller cams than the the wrxs with the same/similar engines?
dr20t wrote:kiahatsiu wrote:Well, it has been about one week since I undertook any modification to my Liberty, so I guess it is time to start looking at cams. As it sits the setup comes on well at around 3.5k, but seems to run out stomp up top. So, I am thinking a set of 264ish 10.somethingish cams, some ID1000s and another day on the dyno might be the go.
Phat, or anyone who is in the know, do the liberty motors have smaller cams than the the wrxs with the same/similar engines?
Yes - smaller lift albeit longer duration to suit the lower peak torque and the dual avcs means a leas aggressive cam profile is used to scavenge as much bottom end rev range efficiency as possible.
One thing to remember with cams is the overall benefit to the motor ( to a point).
When overlap is introduced, and a higher lift is used at the same time, the effective dynamic compression ratio reduces. For example, a cam with say 300thou lift at 0.50" and say overlap of 8 degrees, on a motor with static compression of 9.5:1, would have a dynamic compression ratio at peak excursion of about 9.2:1.
This is due to some of the compressed mixture on compression stroke being reduced slightly as the exhaust valves start to open and assist with the venturi effect to raise volumetric efficiency. This is especially so at higher rev ranges where the motor is choked.
So such an environment allows for greater boost and or timing, which has a compounding positive effect on performance.
But to answer the question yes libs have aller cam profiles than wrexes
Mick

Gambit wrote:And down the rabbit hole we fall
kiahatsiu wrote:Gambit wrote:And down the rabbit hole we fall
Not my first rodeo cowboy.
I am thinking cams next and another tune, and a new fuel system and some ID1000s with corn juice a little down the track. And to start building a 2.5 bottom end in my spare time, you know, just in case.
As it sits now with the vf34 the car is a somewhat inhibited up top, making 180kw @ 5500 rpm, so i am thinking some mildish cams may be the answer. I had been hoping for more power, but it is fun to drive around corners like this. So, as i see it, I can do a little more work, or take it to another tuner with a pulsating dyno.
Off to do some internet research. Those Jun 260s on page one sound useful though.

Maybe a pulse tune![]()

Return to 2.0T engine specific
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests