Coilovers and +35 offset

Springs, shock absorbers, swaybars,
Brakes, Wheels and Tyres

Re: Coilovers and +35 offset

Postby drndrn » Sun Nov 13, 2011 12:01 am

Finky wrote:
robbo wrote:
I used to run BC BR's and thought they were awesome for the price. Plenty of EVO and honda guys run them with no issues. I'm now running KW V2's and have them pretty close to minimum height (with a little wiggling and shoving I can just fit my iphone under my side skirt)

I used to run 18x9 +35's but now running 18x9.5 +40.

Don't forget it's not all about the offset, it's a combination of offset and width of the rim.

Looks like I might get a set then. Are 8kg back 6kgfront spring rates the same as what your running?
So once I've got the front guards rolled I shouldnt have too much problem lowering it by about 30-40mm all round?
You got any pics of your car..?

If I were you I would get harder springs in the front.. Only because I have BC's but even with a noticeable gap between tyre and guard I still smash the lip of my guard.. I'm running 18x7.5 +38 and going quick over bumps it the death of me haha

Anybody know if you can buy harder springs for BC's?


Just roll your guards and you should be fine. It'll allow you to have some decent ride quality while stopping any possible rubbing.
Diamond Grey 2.5i Heritage
User avatar
drndrn
-stickered-
 
Posts: 1498
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:15 pm
Location: Glen Waverley, Victoria
Car: MY08 Subaru Liberty

Re: Coilovers and +35 offset

Postby smythie » Sun Nov 13, 2011 1:13 pm

or you could raise the suspension to a level that is a bit more suited to the crap roads we drive on in NSW...
Flag Bitch

MY06 3.0RB
User avatar
smythie
 
Posts: 5227
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 12:46 pm
Location: Sydney (w-end)
Car: MY06 3RB - Blue

Re: Coilovers and +35 offset

Postby kiks » Sun Nov 13, 2011 10:18 pm

smythie wrote:or you could raise the suspension to a level that is a bit more suited to the crap roads we drive on in NSW...

And the fact the car is a thousand times better to drive with the factory dynamic geometry still in place, and is overall faster in every way at stock or very close to stock height.
kiks
 
Posts: 944
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 9:13 pm
Location: Brisbane
Car: 1UZTurbo HQ ute, Gen3 1GZ 5L V12 lib

Re: Coilovers and +35 offset

Postby BJ » Tue Nov 15, 2011 7:22 pm

Gambit wrote:What are the chances of 18x8 +43 with 235/40/18s fitting with stock billies and springs ?

Wouldn't it be better to get 18 x 8 with +55 offset or do they scrape on the struts?
User avatar
BJ
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: Adelaide
Car: Liberty 3.0RB

Re: Coilovers and +35 offset

Postby Gambit » Tue Nov 15, 2011 7:32 pm

BJ wrote:
Gambit wrote:What are the chances of 18x8 +43 with 235/40/18s fitting with stock billies and springs ?

Wouldn't it be better to get 18 x 8 with +55 offset or do they scrape on the struts?


They clear the struts but sit way outside the fenders/guards.
User avatar
Gambit
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 7:20 pm
Location: Melbourne
Car: Subaru

Re: Coilovers and +35 offset

Postby coyote » Tue Nov 15, 2011 7:39 pm

kiks wrote:
smythie wrote:or you could raise the suspension to a level that is a bit more suited to the crap roads we drive on in NSW...

And the fact the car is a thousand times better to drive with the factory dynamic geometry still in place, and is overall faster in every way at stock or very close to stock height.


Sup w1t u phools? Dun u no dat da h3ktic stanz n helaflush cn nevva looz? Srzly u g0t kn0 eyedear!
Image

** Team Tony **
User avatar
coyote
 
Posts: 2207
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: brisbane.qld.au

Re: Coilovers and +35 offset

Postby rooby » Tue Nov 15, 2011 7:46 pm

coyote wrote:Sup w1t u phools? Dun u no dat da h3ktic stanz n helaflush cn nevva looz? Srzly u g0t kn0 eyedear!


:lol: :lol:
User avatar
rooby
 
Posts: 2186
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 12:09 am
Location: Canberra
Car: MY07 Liberty GT Spec.B
Real name: Reuben

Re: Coilovers and +35 offset

Postby BJ » Tue Nov 15, 2011 7:56 pm

Gambit wrote:
BJ wrote:
Gambit wrote:What are the chances of 18x8 +43 with 235/40/18s fitting with stock billies and springs ?

Wouldn't it be better to get 18 x 8 with +55 offset or do they scrape on the struts?


They clear the struts but sit way outside the fenders/guards.

+55 would have more inside than +45 not outside so it would sit further in.
User avatar
BJ
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: Adelaide
Car: Liberty 3.0RB

Re: Coilovers and +35 offset

Postby XT_for_me » Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:00 pm

If you lower the car much beyond standard height you will lower the roll center a bit to much and induce some understeer, however Whiteline have a kit for roll center correction. When talking spring rates the Lib will perform best running the same rates front and rear. This is because the rear suspension offers a leverage to the actual spring rate so the effective rate at the rear wheel is lower than the actual spring value. I'd suggest 8kg/mm for front and rear.

I can't offer a lot of information about wheel clearance, but you can play with this: http://www.rimsntires.com/specs.jsp
Stopping is not optional!

KiDo Racing Big Brake Kits, Coilover Suspension, Tunes, Turbo rebuilds, and Kamak Turbos
Brake Kits
Coilovers
Tuning
Chassis Braces

Image
User avatar
XT_for_me
 
Posts: 299
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 5:53 pm
Location: Sunbury VIC.
Car: Subaru Forester MY09 XT
Real name: Bryce

Re: Coilovers and +35 offset

Postby BLKGTB » Tue Nov 29, 2011 1:19 pm

That link is gold... Nice one XT

http://www.rimsntires.com/specs.jsp


Answers all questions... Robbo suggest you do the same as it will display how much your new wheels and tyres will stick out from the fender showing how much the guards need to be rolled. Regardless of your new springs .... Any pot holes and you'll hit the guards.

Who rolls guards "professionally" in Melbourne .... Anyone ?
User avatar
BLKGTB
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:26 pm
Location: melbourne
Car: '07 GT B
Real name: Andrew

Re: Coilovers and +35 offset

Postby kiks » Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:47 pm

XT_for_me wrote:If you lower the car much beyond standard height you will lower the roll center a bit to much and induce some understeer, however Whiteline have a kit for roll center correction. When talking spring rates the Lib will perform best running the same rates front and rear. This is because the rear suspension offers a leverage to the actual spring rate so the effective rate at the rear wheel is lower than the actual spring value. I'd suggest 8kg/mm for front and rear.

I can't offer a lot of information about wheel clearance, but you can play with this: http://www.rimsntires.com/specs.jsp


So far wrong it is not even funny, and obvious of someone who has never tested much, and is trying to flog chinabay shit to people.

If you did even a few hours of research, let alone development and testing on a gen 3 or gen4 liberty you would know how utterly shit they handle with 8kg springs in the front, let alone both front and rear.

For what its worth, using the best bolt on coilovers money can buy (without going to a specialised setup until early next year with DMS 50 gravels), and spending a shitload of time rearranging the rear end of my car and making the front end actually strong enough to bother even measuring differences the absolute fastest I can get it is with 6.9kg front springs and 9.7kg rears now. And that is in a 3.0RB wagon. Let alone a 4cyl lib where I'd happily imagine closer to 6.5kg and and 8 to 8.5 kg in the rear would be suitable with properly valved shocks.

As for the OEM bilsteins, with gen4 billies in a gen3, using 5kg fronts and about 6.5kg rears and althrough the rear is slightly oversprung for the shock, it is infinitely better than sti pink rears and fronts, etc. The rear shock oscillates a little when its not loaded, but thats not so much of an issue if you are smooth on the thing. Jumping wildly from left to right whilst stomping on the brakes like its gran turismo means you end up facing backwards. But when driven smoothly its so much quicker than having equal spring rates that allow the rear to pitch around and unweight the inside tyre too much etc.

8kg fronts in a 4cyl liberty would result in longer stopping distances, nearly no squat and the dynamic toe in that fairly much is what makes these things not plough off into the trees, and god knows how bad the traction loss would be on a normal australian road when trying to get power down.

And that's not even taking into consideration that at 8kg, lowered a little, the roll centre in the rear is somewhere below ground level by a good 3 inches, and in the front is fixable with a little kit from whiteline etc that then makes you know how bad bump steer can be, and with such a stiff spring fairly much negates any anti roll bar you have on the stock mounts.

Sorry to say, but spinning bullshit without even considering talking to people who have spent considerable time and money in making a gen4 handle is unprofessional. All of this is still with the horrible factory diff, no front lsd (lol 8kg springs and no lsd), and viscous rear that at the best of times makes the car a dog to drive near the limit and downright dangerous in the wet with power if you dont know what's about to happen (let alone with NO suspension compliance at all). There is a reason I have a box of various differentials, control arms, lateral links, driveshaft lengths, subframe arrangement, subframe spacers, tie rod end lengths, many many sets of 2.5id 8" linear and non linear springs, etc etc at home and thats because as a consumer, I want the best. Since people take the low road and offer cheap garbage thai crap, 14pot brakes, and dozens of other untested shit, means I need to spend the money to work out what works best and thus share that knowledge happily with anyone that will listen, as I have no vested interest in keeping it secret as a business. The only thing I ever do is mention the business names of people who help me source gear, so they can maybe get some business from it.

The worst thing is when they try and offer that shit to a consumer and palm it off, and the customer then wonders 'wtf' as the stock suspension that subaru spent millions designing outperformed it and they realised they've gone backwards, but are now hectic low fully sick.

*rant off. Im out.
kiks
 
Posts: 944
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 9:13 pm
Location: Brisbane
Car: 1UZTurbo HQ ute, Gen3 1GZ 5L V12 lib

Re: Coilovers and +35 offset

Postby BJ » Tue Nov 29, 2011 3:02 pm

kiks wrote:As for the OEM bilsteins, with gen4 billies in a gen3, using 5kg fronts and about 6.5kg rears

So are you saying the standard 3RB with bilsteins has spring rates of 5kg/mm front and 6.5kg/mm rear?
Excellent post by the way.
User avatar
BJ
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: Adelaide
Car: Liberty 3.0RB

Re: Coilovers and +35 offset

Postby kiks » Tue Nov 29, 2011 4:39 pm

Nowhere near that. Stock is in the order of 42 and 34n/mm which is effectively 4 and 3.5 kg. sti pinks are 5 and 4 give or take a decimal. S402 are more like 5 and 6.5. Hence they handle decent, but they have the diffs to pull it off.
kiks
 
Posts: 944
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 9:13 pm
Location: Brisbane
Car: 1UZTurbo HQ ute, Gen3 1GZ 5L V12 lib

Re: Coilovers and +35 offset

Postby neni » Wed Nov 30, 2011 7:57 pm

BLKGTB wrote:That link is gold... Nice one XT
Who rolls guards "professionally" in Melbourne .... Anyone ?


call up dt panels 8)
neni
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:31 pm
Location: SE Suburbs Melbourne
Car: MY02 B4
Real name: Neni

Previous

Return to Suspension, Brakes, Wheels and Tyres.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests