+1 to what Adhar says.
Why ruin stock springs when for not much more or the same price you can get lowered springs with a higher spring rate to compensate for the reduced travel.
bugli wrote:I heard a rumour that we can't lower anymore than 35mm (gen III) is that fact or fiction?
adhar wrote:
But, I had a Gen 3 previously and lowered it 60mm in the front and 40 mm in the back wit Kmacs on standard shocks. The ride was er, ah, um... lets just say firm.
teK-- wrote:You could have just said no.

thomasw wrote:adhar wrote:
But, I had a Gen 3 previously and lowered it 60mm in the front and 40 mm in the back wit Kmacs on standard shocks. The ride was er, ah, um... lets just say firm.
many problems with speed humps, driveways etc?
adhar wrote:thomasw wrote:adhar wrote:
But, I had a Gen 3 previously and lowered it 60mm in the front and 40 mm in the back wit Kmacs on standard shocks. The ride was er, ah, um... lets just say firm.
many problems with speed humps, driveways etc?
I could pretty much get it up any drives or speedbumps.
Some required some angling but you get used to it. You also get used to scraping sounds.
With 16 inch wheels the sill was at 100mm from the ground so it was just on legal. Put a heap of passengers in and that is a different story!!
bugli wrote:
Pics?
Cops rock up... Everyone out!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests