Tradewind wrote:I have a question
How many owners take their 3.0 out to 7200rpm for a blast a few times a week?? Say 2-3 times
Tradewind wrote:The other thing that is clear, the first chart shows the difference of the header alone, tq peak occurring 200-300 rpm sooner, peak power 5-7kw higher at 6600rpm and a 28kw gain at 7300rpm
saffarco wrote:Still waiting guys for someone with an AT transy to help all of us(
scottb721 wrote:saffarco wrote:Still waiting guys for someone with an AT transy to help all of us(
I've got an AT. What help's needed ?
GTbee wrote:Tradewind wrote:The other thing that is clear, the first chart shows the difference of the header alone, tq peak occurring 200-300 rpm sooner, peak power 5-7kw higher at 6600rpm and a 28kw gain at 7300rpm
I'm a little confused. Is this gain above on a non-SC car with the headers only?
west_minist wrote:Results are prelim.
Stats:
I performed tuning on v11b rom which was done on the stock headers. Raptor headers was installed on v11b and results shown below. The last two readers at the bottom is pre-raptor headers.
Taking v11b and adding timing (2 - 4 degrees) that was taken out during tuning, please see the graph below. v11C was done at 21C while v11b at 24-26C.
v11d been release. I am awaiting data.
I didn't have any trouble following. No apologies necessary IMO.west_minist wrote:Dear All:
I want to apologised for my lack of details or full explanation of stuff and maybe... not so communicative.
I am a little tied up with lifeand working on 2x Group N tunes on two STI's. Both statement cars. I have a few sti's I am working on which have some issues too.
http://www.romraider.com/forum/viewtopi ... 8&start=30
Tradewind wrote:Considering the results now coming forward from the headers the fellow who bought the header set I had on Ebay has scored the bargin of the century!
This has to be the number one choice of anyone who tracks their car or is a power hungry NA driver.
Return to 3.0R & 3.6R engine specific
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest