On2youliberty wrote:fuck how much reading did I just do. gen v auto kills all of your asses
Who's manual Gen V did a faster time at WSID?
6MT for me any day!
On2youliberty wrote:fuck how much reading did I just do. gen v auto kills all of your asses
KiDo_Tuning wrote:195kw@wheels from an Auto LGT today Alexei.
Mods? Decatted dump pipe plus tune.
alexeiwoody wrote:KiDo_Tuning wrote:195kw@wheels from an Auto LGT today Alexei.
Mods? Decatted dump pipe plus tune.
Going to sound like a douche. Apologies in advance. But we've covered this a number of times - and still no graph or info about dyno. For example - what did it make stock?
Your 195kw auto is slower than a 200kw manual, even with a slower launch.
An auto 200kw gen4 wagon with the same launch time was a full 0.6 of a second faster.
And lastly considering how much more advantageous the gen5 auto setup is...that really tells us something isn't right.
Let's just say I still call BS, and you've got the facts against you.
In the end, as long as it drives well, that's all that matters
KiDo_Tuning wrote:alexeiwoody wrote:KiDo_Tuning wrote:195kw@wheels from an Auto LGT today Alexei.
Mods? Decatted dump pipe plus tune.
Going to sound like a douche. Apologies in advance. But we've covered this a number of times - and still no graph or info about dyno. For example - what did it make stock?
Your 195kw auto is slower than a 200kw manual, even with a slower launch.
An auto 200kw gen4 wagon with the same launch time was a full 0.6 of a second faster.
And lastly considering how much more advantageous the gen5 auto setup is...that really tells us something isn't right.
Let's just say I still call BS, and you've got the facts against you.
In the end, as long as it drives well, that's all that matters
Bretts car is still conservative due to the dump pipe and our tuning schedule clash.
195kw car is not his. It went to the drags previously though and should be going back shortly to see the improvements in mph and ET.
Also if you think peak power was good... wait til you see the power output at peak torque
alexeiwoody wrote:I was assuming you can get consistent results between cars, both basically stock cars (only a dump).
Manaz wrote:(things like AMG hand-built engines, where they're really bloody careful to make things as consistent as possible). On mass produced engines, that's just not going to happen.
Manaz wrote:(Just to take the discussion down another path)alexeiwoody wrote:I was assuming you can get consistent results between cars, both basically stock cars (only a dump).
If only this were true. Unfortunately, even two brand new stock cars with exactly the same setup can (and invariably do) have different power outputs, thanks to the interaction of manufacturing variances across all the components that go into each car. Add an aftermarket dump, and unless they're the same design (and even then...), yoiu're just adding another variable.
The only way to get reliable consistent power outputs out of two engines is either blueprint them, or be talking about high performance engines built to exacting standards (things like AMG hand-built engines, where they're really bloody careful to make things as consistent as possible). On mass produced engines, that's just not going to happen.
alexeiwoody wrote:
Matt, this convo is all a big wank. Sorry. You're never wrong, even when a manual beats your auto.
I understand the car that ran the 13.66 wasn't the 195kw car. I was assuming you can get consistent results between cars, both basically stock cars (only a dump).
I'm not particularly enjoying pointing out flaws in other people's cars and I know you're tired of this silliness.
Just tune the cars. Let the owners run some times, if they're that way inclined. Everyone can see what's what.
So far - you're not exactly winning in the 1/4 time area, but at least it appears the two 5eat gen5 owners are quite happy with their cars.
dazzz168 wrote:The best bang for buck mod for pretty much any subaru is a dump pipe and tune. My Forester ran low 13s with just a dump and tune.
Matt, that dyno graph of tat 195KW gen 5 looks like boost was spiking cause the bump in power and torque towards the end of the pull. That can't be healthy if there's spike/creep like that. Got a graph showing the boost?
kiahatsiu wrote:Time has very little to do with power. 200kw at 1500kgs should trap about 103 mph. Simple as that.
kiahatsiu wrote:Time has very little to do with power. 200kw at 1500kgs should trap about 103 mph. Simple as that.
kiahatsiu wrote:Time has very little to do with power. 200kw at 1500kgs should trap about 103 mph. Simple as that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests