Hi Matt.
with the car doing hard shifts from 2nd to 3rd, will a reflash/tune of the tcu fix this?
BATMAN87 wrote:Hi Matt.
with the car doing hard shifts from 2nd to 3rd, will a reflash/tune of the tcu fix this?
alexeiwoody wrote:I have a question - why dial in 430Req Tq if while logging the car - RR shows the ECU raw data ReqTq value is limited at 408?
KiDo_Tuning wrote:alexeiwoody wrote:I have a question - why dial in 430Req Tq if while logging the car - RR shows the ECU raw data ReqTq value is limited at 408?
Highest logged output via log limiter. My per gear requested torque is at 430 in 1st... If 430 was an impossible value then 1st would run off 408 for WGDC and Target Boost as would 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th... but sort of proven that is impossible
alexeiwoody wrote:KiDo_Tuning wrote:alexeiwoody wrote:I have a question - why dial in 430Req Tq if while logging the car - RR shows the ECU raw data ReqTq value is limited at 408?
Highest logged output via log limiter. My per gear requested torque is at 430 in 1st... If 430 was an impossible value then 1st would run off 408 for WGDC and Target Boost as would 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th... but sort of proven that is impossible
Thanks Matt, I was wondering why it's logging only 408, but as you said then it wouldn't be 'hitting' the 430 regions on WGDC or boost...
Then would there be benefits to going higher ReqTq? Or would going to 500 blow up the box
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests