Macintosh Balanced outputs - How was it confirmed?

Stereos, amps, phone kits, Navi...

Macintosh Balanced outputs - How was it confirmed?

Postby cpitts » Thu Oct 02, 2008 11:51 pm

Hey guys,

There's lots of mentions of the output to the power amp being balanced. Just wanting to understand HOW this was confirmed to be balanced v's unbalanced.

Having done some reading up on both formats, there seems to be ways and means to convert between the two formats (even at the connector level) so just wondering where this common statement of 'its balanced' came from? Has it been confirmed by Clarion?

Very interested as this whole 'upgraded amp' thing could be very quickly sorted.

Also, has anyone tried re-earthing the HU with decent fuses and cables to the battery (incl clean 12v power) to see if it gets rid of the hiss?
cpitts
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:54 pm
Location: Melbourne, AU

Postby Ric » Fri Oct 03, 2008 8:21 am

All the audio passes down a multiwire cable coming out the back of the McIntosh.
It's labelled "DIN CORD" in this diagram:
Image


and is the thick black cord you can see someone holding in this pic:
Image


and this is the pinout of the DIN plug that I've worked out by experiment:
Image

You can see there is a "+" and a "-" signal for each audio channel.
Neither of these is connected to ground, and you would probably damage the HU if you did connect one side to ground.


Also, has anyone tried re-earthing the HU with decent fuses and cables to the battery (incl clean 12v power) to see if it gets rid of the hiss?
When can you hear hiss? Mine is very quiet. The noisiest bit is the cooling fan on the power-amp.
User avatar
Ric
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6481
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:08 pm
Location: Melbourne
Car: OLD: MY06 3RB Wagon NEW: MY21 Outbck
Real name: Ric
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=12

Re: Macintosh Balanced outputs - How was it confirmed?

Postby Mo_GT » Fri Oct 03, 2008 12:53 pm

cpitts wrote:Hey guys,

There's lots of mentions of the output to the power amp being balanced. Just wanting to understand HOW this was confirmed to be balanced v's unbalanced.

Having done some reading up on both formats, there seems to be ways and means to convert between the two formats (even at the connector level) so just wondering where this common statement of 'its balanced' came from? Has it been confirmed by Clarion?

Very interested as this whole 'upgraded amp' thing could be very quickly sorted.


You can convert any unbalanced signal to a balanced signal with a LOC or line driver with this function and using the proper rca that supports this.

From Ric's diagram it doesn't look like the output to the amp is balanced +ve to -ve .

But since the term "balanced" can be used creatively, if i were marketing this product and i wanted to throw a fancy term in to make it sound impressive I could say that it has balannced signals and mean that the outputs from the Hu were balanced to the input of the amp.
Never Argue With An Idiot... They'll Drag You Down To Their Level And Then Beat You With Experience.
User avatar
Mo_GT
 
Posts: 697
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:48 pm
Location: Perth
Car: GT Spec B

Re: Macintosh Balanced outputs - How was it confirmed?

Postby Ric » Fri Oct 03, 2008 1:46 pm

Mo_GT wrote:...
From Ric's diagram it doesn't look like the output to the amp is balanced +ve to -ve .
...

What makes you say that?
For the five channels (FR, FL, RR, RL, and SUB) there is certainly a "+" and a "-" signal. Both of them are swinging, presumably in antiphase. That is certainly "balanced" in my book. :)
User avatar
Ric
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6481
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:08 pm
Location: Melbourne
Car: OLD: MY06 3RB Wagon NEW: MY21 Outbck
Real name: Ric
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=12

Postby cpitts » Fri Oct 03, 2008 3:21 pm

Ah, ok, so the theory is based on the +/- aspect of the diagram. In which case the balanced aspect is assumed.

Have you measured voltages to test your theory?
cpitts
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:54 pm
Location: Melbourne, AU

Re: Macintosh Balanced outputs - How was it confirmed?

Postby Mo_GT » Fri Oct 03, 2008 3:51 pm

Ric wrote:
Mo_GT wrote:...
From Ric's diagram it doesn't look like the output to the amp is balanced +ve to -ve .
...

What makes you say that?
For the five channels (FR, FL, RR, RL, and SUB) there is certainly a "+" and a "-" signal. Both of them are swinging, presumably in antiphase. That is certainly "balanced" in my book. :)


Usually, on a balanced pair there is a third wire for each pair(ground).

A pic i found online:

Image
Never Argue With An Idiot... They'll Drag You Down To Their Level And Then Beat You With Experience.
User avatar
Mo_GT
 
Posts: 697
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:48 pm
Location: Perth
Car: GT Spec B

Postby Mo_GT » Fri Oct 03, 2008 3:53 pm

I should add that some twisted pair rca's might use a metal foil sheid that acts as ground and is able to carry a balanced signal thru.

Balanced:
Image

Unbalanced:
Image

With these RCA's there's no third wire but the number of twists per length becomes the main factor in keeping the signal balanced.
Never Argue With An Idiot... They'll Drag You Down To Their Level And Then Beat You With Experience.
User avatar
Mo_GT
 
Posts: 697
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:48 pm
Location: Perth
Car: GT Spec B

Postby cpitts » Fri Oct 03, 2008 4:22 pm

Mo_GT, you're reasonings are exactly why I'm questioning whether the signals from the plug ARE actually balanced.

From what I can see, I see a high density connector to replace a large wad of standard RCA cables (all which have 2 cores).

This may be not quite as hard as people are making out. (At least, in my mind.)

Not meaning anyone harm, just seeking appropriate ratification of this commonly held belief.
cpitts
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:54 pm
Location: Melbourne, AU

Re: Macintosh Balanced outputs - How was it confirmed?

Postby Ric » Fri Oct 03, 2008 5:00 pm

Mo_GT wrote:Usually, on a balanced pair there is a third wire for each pair(ground).


In an "unbalanced" connection, the signal is between the signal wire and ground.
In a balanced connection, the signal is between "+" and "-". Ground is just there for protection. You can regard the power supply ground as forming this connection in the McIntosh lead.

Yes, I've measured the voltages. After studying Electronic Engineering for four years, and being a practicing electronic engineer for 25 years, in my considered opinion this IS a "balanced" connection. 8)
(But I also think you could easily connect is to an unbalanced system with just a small coupling transformer for each channel.)
User avatar
Ric
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6481
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:08 pm
Location: Melbourne
Car: OLD: MY06 3RB Wagon NEW: MY21 Outbck
Real name: Ric
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=12

Postby cpitts » Fri Oct 03, 2008 11:55 pm

Something worth noting is that the current McIntosh car head unit line-up consists of all HU's having line level RCA Line Outs for connection to amps.

eg: http://www.roger-russell.com/caraud.htm

and

http://www.mcintoshlabs.com
- look under the owners reference area at Car Audio. There's a manual for their current HU offering.

EDIT: My point here being that companies don't just change tact for one head unit in their line-up. Esp if it's built to a price point for OEM delivery.
Last edited by cpitts on Sat Oct 04, 2008 7:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
cpitts
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:54 pm
Location: Melbourne, AU

Re: Macintosh Balanced outputs - How was it confirmed?

Postby Mo_GT » Sat Oct 04, 2008 12:15 am

Ric wrote:
Yes, I've measured the voltages. After studying Electronic Engineering for four years, and being a practicing electronic engineer for 25 years, in my considered opinion this IS a "balanced" connection. 8)


Your qualification and experience trumps mine in this area so your opinion trumps mine :D

Just out of interes, what were the voltages of the outputs from the HU?
Never Argue With An Idiot... They'll Drag You Down To Their Level And Then Beat You With Experience.
User avatar
Mo_GT
 
Posts: 697
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:48 pm
Location: Perth
Car: GT Spec B

Postby Ric » Sat Oct 04, 2008 8:30 am

I unplugged the cable from the power amp, placed a 1k resistor between "+" and "-" on each channel, and watched the RMS AC voltagerise and fall as I adjusted volume and balance to identify each channel (and bass to confirm which was the sub).
As I recall, it was just over 1V at full volume.
What I didn't do was connect both "+" and "-" to an oscilloscope, to confirm what each wire was doing in relation to ground.
User avatar
Ric
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6481
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:08 pm
Location: Melbourne
Car: OLD: MY06 3RB Wagon NEW: MY21 Outbck
Real name: Ric
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=12

Postby overl0ad » Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:07 am

ric, do you do stuff like this just cos you're bored?

:P
tangcla wrote:I didn't have to. I have girly Asian hands :lol:
User avatar
overl0ad
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 8:46 pm
Location: Mel-burn!!!
Car: MY07 GTB 6MT *sold*
Real name: Gerald

Postby cpitts » Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:44 am

Any chance you can do the CRO check? I know it's a massive ask but if you still have the unit out on the bench . . .. . ;)


Edit. Oops, I accidentally edited your post instead of quoting it as I intended. Sorry, I lost a coiple of lines. Ric
cpitts
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:54 pm
Location: Melbourne, AU

Postby Mo_GT » Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:08 pm

Cool, when i have some time i might try and wire up a rca to one of the speaker outputs and send it to an amp and see if the voltage is high enough for the amp to receive.

cpitts, you can get a line driver and solve your problem?
Never Argue With An Idiot... They'll Drag You Down To Their Level And Then Beat You With Experience.
User avatar
Mo_GT
 
Posts: 697
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:48 pm
Location: Perth
Car: GT Spec B

Next

Return to Audio options

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests