cricket. howzdat?

by **EJ25** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 4:43 pm

anyone been watching the cricket.. ?

by **brendans225** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 5:36 pm

by **sinist4** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 6:23 pm

yea... wat a bloody ripper that ball was from macgill, leggy from outside off, hit the ruff and BAM stump outta the ground.

i was meant to be study for an exam tmr...

haha

by **markii** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 6:55 pm

i love to play cricket, but i cant watch cricket..
it does my head it

by **EJ25** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 8:15 pm

sinist4 wrote:
i was meant to be study for an exam tmr... haha

same LOL

by **adam** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:12 am

macgill is so underrated. Apparently he got his 200 quicker than murali AND warne?!

by **libsti** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:27 pm

macgill is OK but not in the same class as warnie,
macgill 8 years to reach 200 wickets
warne 13 years to reach 708 wickets

do you think macgill will catch him?

never

by **adam** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:54 am

it was the number of tests played that i was referring to.
it was a bit of a "thorpe/hackett" thing with warne and stewie i think.... except that at least grant could still swim.... he was just the 2nd greatest of his time? there were at least a few times that stuart should have been picked ahead of shane.

by **metalcar** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 9:29 am

Didn't get to watch it (stupid not telecast in the city its being playing in rules) But did keep track of the fantastic effort.

Australia lost 4 wickets, dismissed 20 and won by an innings and 40, and would've probably done it in 4 days without the rain. Great way to start the local summer. So looking forward to being in melbourne for the boxing day test

by **MY07GT** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 10:10 pm

One sport i never got.

Phil.

cricket. howzdat?

cricket. howzdat?

Who is online