There's been a lot of discussion both here and on facebook about braking force etc, Here's the actual math on the torque of these systems.
Note that this is simply about actual torque application - the bigger the rotor, the more heat can be dissapated. Also not that this is not related to pads - stock pads on brembos won't be able to match performance pads on LGT brakes and so on.
* LGT/H6 vs brembos Front - brembos have 4.11% more -
* LGT/H6 vs brembos rears - brembos have 5.85% *LESS* (Yes, this surprised me as well)
* LGT/H6 vs WRX 4 pots - LGT front brakes have 5.76% more
* LGT/H6 vs WRX 4 pots - LGT rears have 10.38% more.
I didn't have data on the single pot NA, but safe to say it's well below all of those.
In terms of rotor size it's simply brembo > LGT > WRX
This means that the best performing brake setup (in terms of torque) is infact brembo fronts and LGT rears.
Note also that this comparison does not include a variable for how 'baller' the brakes look.
Further reading:
http://stoptech.com/technical-support/t ... c-calipers (TLDR: monobloc calipers are mostly bullshit - a good two piece will almost certainly be BETTER)
http://stoptech.com/technical-support/t ... ther-myths (brake rotors don't warp)