Ok so the exhaust and tune have been done....need more power

Posts specific to the 2.5 litre turbo engine

Postby cpitts » Fri May 08, 2009 1:16 pm

scary wrote:<snip>
Without me having to go searching does anyone know what injectors the 2.5's run?

I'm yet to hear of anyone needing to upgrade injectors with power levels up to 240kW ATW. I'm basing this on those that have modded with reputable tuning houses that keep an eye on IDC, fuel temps and fuel quality contingency. About the only thing you may consider (which I'm looking into) is a parallel rail setup to ensure even and consisten pressure to all injectors under max load. But even that seems to be less of an issue on these 2.5l blocks. Maybe FHI figured out their end of rail pressure issues, etc. :roll: . . . . . . or maybe not....
cpitts
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:54 pm
Location: Melbourne, AU

Postby coyote » Fri May 08, 2009 2:46 pm

Unless it is the highest reading dyno on the planet, any GT Liberty with standard injectors making 240kw atw is reading waaaaay over 100% IDC or has much higher fuel pressure than standard (or both).

Subaru worked out how to have individual fuel trims for each cylinder by setting up a table of pulse width compensations. If you go with parallel rails, you've have to adjust that and I reckon you'd REALLY want to know what you are doing and how those values are used.

As long as your pump can maintain pressure and flow, parallel rails are not necessary in the newer cars ... and an absolute waste with standard injectors.
Image

** Team Tony **
User avatar
coyote
 
Posts: 2207
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: brisbane.qld.au

Postby cpitts » Fri May 08, 2009 3:41 pm

The AVO dyno does tend to read high by comparison to others (maybe +10-15kW ATW). IDC would be measured with a Walbro/Bosch replacement in-tank fuel pump so you'd probabaly steel back 10% IDC there as well.

And as for tuner skills. That's why I use people that do this thing for a living, not me. They've tuned all this stuff before to much higher numbers than my car will ever reach (and most on this forum as well) so the otherwise 'basic' mods we're talking about here are pretty entry level by comparison.

The arguments for/against parallel rails are always hotly contested. Mind you, I've had the same arguments about air filters, silicon pipework, etc. So to each their own.

scary was after some opinions, and that's what he's got. Everything from part numbers to 'take it to Vendor X'. It's up to him to sort the wheat from the chaff now.
cpitts
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:54 pm
Location: Melbourne, AU

Postby scary » Fri May 08, 2009 5:43 pm

soo back to the question......does anone know what injectors the 2.5 runs??
User avatar
scary
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 5:49 pm
Location: Perth WA
Car: MY08 STi

Postby coyote » Fri May 08, 2009 6:05 pm

scary wrote:soo back to the question......does anone know what injectors the 2.5 runs??


Top feed Densos.

I "think" they are 560cc @ 43.5psi.
Image

** Team Tony **
User avatar
coyote
 
Posts: 2207
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: brisbane.qld.au

Postby WhiteGTB » Fri May 08, 2009 6:18 pm

coyote wrote:
scary wrote:soo back to the question......does anone know what injectors the 2.5 runs??


Top feed Densos.

I "think" they are 560cc @ 43.5psi.


Tony, you know wayyyyy too much, you are one of the few that knows their shit but keeps very discreet about it :)
User avatar
WhiteGTB
 
Posts: 3233
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:41 am
Location: Sydney, NSW
Car: MY07 Legacy GT Spec B 6pd

Postby Resonate » Fri May 08, 2009 6:45 pm

Coyote is a sleeper. :lol:
User avatar
Resonate
 
Posts: 925
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 9:36 pm
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Car: MY07 GT-B (Diamond Grey)

Postby cpitts » Fri May 08, 2009 8:53 pm

coyote wrote:
scary wrote:soo back to the question......does anone know what injectors the 2.5 runs??


Top feed Densos.

I "think" they are 560cc @ 43.5psi.

If we know the cc's of fuel that can be delivered, then given an AFR of ~12 (typical target for a tuned EJ-T) what's the peak power that can be derived with these injectors? I don't know of the formula, but surely there is one!
cpitts
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:54 pm
Location: Melbourne, AU

Postby Boxer » Fri May 08, 2009 9:59 pm

Craig, way too complex to nut out - rpm vs fuel rate for starters and then you'll need the capacity of each cylinder and take into account the volumetric efficiency, boost, amount of burn blah blah

Far simpler to know from experience what the injectors max out at whilst monitoring AFR on a dyno and then I'd only go to a max of 90% duty cycle for some headroom.

I think most people see 80-85% at 170kw so I dont think you'll see 240kw on stock fuel delivery
Lifes pretty straight without twisties:

07 Obsidian Black GTB Tuned by STi Wagon 6MT
Boxer
 
Posts: 802
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby Sentinel » Fri May 08, 2009 11:10 pm

Some great discussion in this thread - might keep a watch on this one.
Memoirs of Sentinel:
GT-B | Black | Wagon | Manual | Brembo's | 19"x8 Blaque Diamond Wheels | Tein C/O's w EDFC | Custom Interior | PHAT Zorst | WL Sways | STi Stuff...
Sentinel
-stickered-
 
Posts: 3148
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:43 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby SillySora » Sat May 09, 2009 12:47 am

I'm upgrading mine to the 750 sard injectors as I'm also getting the avo silcone pipe and 450 turbo I will let you know should be going on next week ohh and equal length headers
User avatar
SillySora
 
Posts: 366
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:04 am
Location: Maroochydore
Car: My 08 Liberty
Real name: Shane

Postby Sentinel » Sat May 09, 2009 12:52 am

SillySora wrote:I'm upgrading mine to the 750 sard injectors as I'm also getting the avo silcone pipe and 450 turbo I will let you know should be going on next week ohh and equal length headers


Nice work. Def be interested in how you go.
Memoirs of Sentinel:
GT-B | Black | Wagon | Manual | Brembo's | 19"x8 Blaque Diamond Wheels | Tein C/O's w EDFC | Custom Interior | PHAT Zorst | WL Sways | STi Stuff...
Sentinel
-stickered-
 
Posts: 3148
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:43 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby cpitts » Sat May 09, 2009 8:05 am

Boxer wrote:Craig, way too complex to nut out - rpm vs fuel rate for starters and then you'll need the capacity of each cylinder and take into account the volumetric efficiency, boost, amount of burn blah blah

Fair points. But there should be a theoretical power point that can be determined. In a real car everything from exhaust to air filter will impact real power numbers. But in theory, full fuel squirt from injector (560cc) + oxygen (enough to burn the fuel) x volumetric efficiency x # of cylinders should give a pretty good indication of peak Joules of energy that can be produced.

Boxer wrote:Far simpler to know from experience what the injectors max out at whilst monitoring AFR on a dyno and then I'd only go to a max of 90% duty cycle for some headroom.

I think most people see 80-85% at 170kw so I dont think you'll see 240kw on stock fuel delivery

You can get over 170kW ATW from the injectors in a 2l WRX and it uses a smaller turbo and has a lower factory stated peak power figure! I highly doubt FHI will provide a vehicle with higher peak power figure, bigger capacity and bigger turbo without increasing injector size to suit. I'll dig up some CC sizes for injectors and see how these compare.
EDIT: It's worth noting that the 2l WRX STi (factory 208kW) has bigger injectors than those on a standard WRX (factory 165/168kW). Our cars power is closer to that of the STi, so I'd be inclined to think that FHI will simply pick from the STi parts bucket and drop in the bigger injectors (think volume purchase from Denso and lower part count for dealerships). The only adverse affect of bigger injectors (well at this size anyway) is a slight fuel usage increase at idle.
cpitts
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:54 pm
Location: Melbourne, AU

Postby SillySora » Sat May 09, 2009 8:39 am

Where was all this info when i tried to make a shitty post :P
User avatar
SillySora
 
Posts: 366
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:04 am
Location: Maroochydore
Car: My 08 Liberty
Real name: Shane

Postby ultrablue » Sat May 09, 2009 9:22 am

from autospeed article
Conversions

* 500cc per minute is approximately equal to 49lbs per hour which is equal to approximately 100hp.

* lbs/hour = cc per minute / 10.2

* lbs per hour = HP / 2.04

* cc per minute = lbs per hour x 10.2

* cc per minute = HP x 5

* HP = cc per minute / 5

* HP = lbs per hour x 2.04
Image
User avatar
ultrablue
 
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:54 am
Location: Sydney
Car: 2010 ssv se

PreviousNext

Return to 2.5T engine specific

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests