Modification plan for a non-charged H6/3.0R

Posts specific to the 3.0 litre NA H6 engine

Modification plan for a non-charged H6/3.0R

Postby SegR » Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:43 pm

So I've been thinking about what [second-hand] car I want to change to in a year or two and I've reached the conclusion that for the kind of money I'd be looking at (maybe 30k give or take) I'm not going to find a lot that's less than 4 years old and gives me much of an upgrade from my existing 3.0R in terms of interior, exterior design, handling or performance. A late model VW R36 is probably as close as I'd come but it's only a marginal improvement anyway.

Conclusion: I'm probably going to be keeping this car for a while.

Solution: mod this fucker

Restrictions: I can't supercharge/turbocharge the car as it creates a problem with people on their P's not being able to drive it (or removes the problem, depending on whose perspective you look at it from). I reserve the right to reneg on this decision at a random point in time.

Current setup: MY05 3.0R AUTO with STI quads, dixcel pads & rotors, tuned for 98RON and other minor changes.

Looking for:
* power increase especially in low & mid rev bands
* maintain some backpressure in exhaust to maintain low-end torque
* no drone
* slight sound increase OK but nothing significant
* minimal loss of ground clearance due to exhaust components

Considering:
* Raptor headers
* Replacement of front two cats with high flow (200/100cell) versions (one per bank) and join to centre pipe with new 2-1 collector [advice from Robbks]
* Removal of third cat in 2-1 pipe [advice from Robbks]
* Maintaining existing mufflers (STI quads)

Unsure about:
* Whether to keep centre pipe stock or not
* Whether a change to the resonator required to keep noise under control

Sure about: the fact that no matter what I do, I'll still want more.

LUVIT, BJ, bates91 and probably others are happy with the performance gains given by new headers combined with other various exhaust mods.

I'd appreciate any feedback from anyone who has gone down this path and can suggest what I should or shouldn't be considering. I'm hoping at the end of the process I can come up with the 'ideal' change package which others with the H6 can refer to when they have the desire for more power but don't want to go down the charged route.
Last edited by SegR on Tue Apr 23, 2013 7:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Team Beards
Beards Don't Kill People, People With Beards Kill People.
SegR
 
Posts: 1240
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 9:11 am
Location: Brisbane
Car: MY05 3.0R sedan, black
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=14605

Re: Build plan for a non-charged H6/3.0R

Postby Robbks » Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:57 pm

Drive to Noosa,
Leave car with AM Auto for a week while you have a holiday
get this done viewtopic.php?f=16&t=21509
Surely $10K should cover it... Al.?
drive home.. :D
coyote wrote:Sure, a GTR is fast ... but it's about as interesting as listening to grass grow.
User avatar
Robbks
 
Posts: 2185
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:21 am
Location: Hobart, Tas
Car: MY06 3.0RB Wagon
Real name: Rob
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=12350

Re: Build plan for a non-charged H6/3.0R

Postby SegR » Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:59 pm

Robbks wrote:Drive to Noosa,
Leave car with AM Auto for a week while you have a holiday
get this done viewtopic.php?f=16&t=21509
Surely $10K should cover it... Al.?
drive home.. :D


If only my constraints weren't my constraints :-)
Team Beards
Beards Don't Kill People, People With Beards Kill People.
SegR
 
Posts: 1240
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 9:11 am
Location: Brisbane
Car: MY05 3.0R sedan, black
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=14605

Re: Build plan for a non-charged H6/3.0R

Postby alessandro132 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:00 pm

If you want more power but retain the most practicality and flexibility, just supercharge it.

SC kit is easily undoable and can be sold off when/if needed unlike a turbo which requires a heap of custom work (whole exhaust including fabricating new headers, up pipe, dump, plus you have to consider custom IC piping, all of which equals $$$).

Benefits of SC (and accompanying mods) is that it's flexible and modular. You can buy the same full headers back exhaust irrespective of whether you go SC or NA. Similarly you can either go non-cooled or water-cooled SC kits. You'll need to upgrade injectors and/or fuel pump but they're pretty minor mods and can also be easily undone.

Torque curves of SC vs turbo are quite different; SC will uniformly lift torque across the whole rev range plus has no lag. You'd get a damn solid increase in power too.

Food for thought :wink:
TEAM TOYOTA | TEAM HKS

Cusco, HPI, HKS, and a few other bits...
User avatar
alessandro132
-stickered-
 
Posts: 2380
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:40 am
Location: Sydney
Car: 2000 JZX100 Toyota Chaser Tourer V
Real name: Al
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16914

Re: Build plan for a non-charged H6/3.0R

Postby SegR » Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:19 pm

I would love to supercharge it, but as stated above, I am looking for the next best thing when supercharging & turbocharging is not possible.
Team Beards
Beards Don't Kill People, People With Beards Kill People.
SegR
 
Posts: 1240
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 9:11 am
Location: Brisbane
Car: MY05 3.0R sedan, black
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=14605

Re: Build plan for a non-charged H6/3.0R

Postby Robbks » Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:27 pm

Forget the P-plater thing, start tapping girls older than 17,
restriction removed... :D
coyote wrote:Sure, a GTR is fast ... but it's about as interesting as listening to grass grow.
User avatar
Robbks
 
Posts: 2185
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:21 am
Location: Hobart, Tas
Car: MY06 3.0RB Wagon
Real name: Rob
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=12350

Re: Build plan for a non-charged H6/3.0R

Postby alessandro132 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:31 pm

Robbks wrote:Forget the P-plater thing, start tapping girls older than 17,
restriction removed... :D


:lol: :lol: :lol:
TEAM TOYOTA | TEAM HKS

Cusco, HPI, HKS, and a few other bits...
User avatar
alessandro132
-stickered-
 
Posts: 2380
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:40 am
Location: Sydney
Car: 2000 JZX100 Toyota Chaser Tourer V
Real name: Al
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16914

Re: Build plan for a non-charged H6/3.0R

Postby Hotwire » Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:33 pm

|MY04 Liberty GT Wagon - Premium| |Anti Lift Kit | 18% Tint | 18" Speedy Fin7 |Now the Wifes|
|MY09 MkV Volkswagen GTi| | DSG | Leather | Sunroof | 18% Tint | Mine! |
User avatar
Hotwire
 
Posts: 928
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:36 pm
Location: Adelaide, SA
Car: MY04 GT Wagon Premium
Real name: Lee

Re: Build plan for a non-charged H6/3.0R

Postby HoFF » Tue Apr 23, 2013 3:02 pm

Surely an R36 is more than a marginal improvement.
User avatar
HoFF
-stickered-
 
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:39 am
Location: Southern Highlands NSW
Car: MY06 3RB Liberty Wagon 6MT MY09 Foz
Real name: Tom
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=13577&start=255

Re: Build plan for a non-charged H6/3.0R

Postby dawesy » Tue Apr 23, 2013 3:08 pm

Bates91 didn't have raptors ;) had k2 header which now sit nicely on my car
By the time you price up raptors headers cats and join pipe the k2 arnt to much more and give a differnt sound as well.

Really need an idea of what you realistically want to spend on a non boosted build there's a video of an imprezza running a na worked svx 3.3 h6 motor at like 250+atw

Headers and tune give a nice get up and go it's very noticeable after riding in Simon's car then back to mine .
But it's no turbo set up

Bang for buk would ve a sc kit as stated but all comes down to budget
User avatar
dawesy
 
Posts: 584
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:07 pm
Location: parramtta area
Car: my05 3.0R-B sedan
Real name: Chris

Re: Build plan for a non-charged H6/3.0R

Postby SegR » Tue Apr 23, 2013 7:04 pm

Robbks wrote:Forget the P-plater thing, start tapping girls older than 17,
restriction removed... :D


Swap one blower for another huh...

Hotwire wrote:E85


Love the idea, but there's one servo with 25 minutes' drive of home which has it and if I leave Brisbane I'm rooted. And I'm not willing to keep a drum of it sitting around. If only it were as available as 98.

HoFF wrote:Surely an R36 is more than a marginal improvement.


Yeah, it probably is a little better than I stated... 40kW but at the expense of 140kg extra weight... and I had been looking at wagons which have a further weight hit so not apples for apples. Either way an R36 is going to set me back at least $12k more than what I might sell the 3.0R for, minus rego transfer and other costs. I just don't think it's worth it for the expense. If I were starting from scratch, sure.

dawesy wrote:Bates91 didn't have raptors ;) had k2 header which now sit nicely on my car
...
Really need an idea of what you realistically want to spend on a non boosted build there's a video of an imprezza running a na worked svx 3.3 h6 motor at like 250+atw


My mistake... OP updated.
Budget is $2k or maybe a little more. I'm looking at minor mods here not an all out engine build :-)
Team Beards
Beards Don't Kill People, People With Beards Kill People.
SegR
 
Posts: 1240
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 9:11 am
Location: Brisbane
Car: MY05 3.0R sedan, black
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=14605

Re: Modification plan for a non-charged H6/3.0R

Postby J0HNATH0N » Wed Apr 24, 2013 12:31 am

Thought I would check. Can anyone confirm an electric water pump, taking load off the engine would be viable for the h6? I don't know anything about them but apparently can give up to 10kw gain across rev range... That paired with raptor headers, X-force centre and y pipe and a retune should provide 200+hp to the treads.....would be lively no?
User avatar
J0HNATH0N
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 1:08 am
Location: Western Australia
Car: MY06 3.0RB
Real name: Johnathon
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=19423

Re: Modification plan for a non-charged H6/3.0R

Postby Robbks » Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:48 am

J0HNATH0N wrote:Thought I would check. Can anyone confirm an electric water pump, taking load off the engine would be viable for the h6? I don't know anything about them but apparently can give up to 10kw gain across rev range... That paired with raptor headers, X-force centre and y pipe and a retune should provide 200+hp to the treads.....would be lively no?


Where does the electric water-pump get it's energy from..?
Battery.
Where is battery charged from?
Alternator.
What spins the alternator?
Engine.

Energy can not be created nor destroyed

BUT, a complete managed electric system that allows removal of thermostat and the pump impeller (restrictions) will operate more effeciently
10KW more effieciently, maybe not.
coyote wrote:Sure, a GTR is fast ... but it's about as interesting as listening to grass grow.
User avatar
Robbks
 
Posts: 2185
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:21 am
Location: Hobart, Tas
Car: MY06 3.0RB Wagon
Real name: Rob
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=12350

Re: Modification plan for a non-charged H6/3.0R

Postby KiDo_Tuning » Wed Apr 24, 2013 5:32 pm

SegR: The E85 option allows for dual fuel on the same tune ;)
KiDo Racing Tunes Info: HERE

Great minds discuss ideas;
Average minds discuss events;
Small minds discuss people
User avatar
KiDo_Tuning
 
Posts: 2801
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:53 pm
Car: Subarus + Nissans
Real name: Matt

Re: Build plan for a non-charged H6/3.0R

Postby SH30RB » Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:11 pm

dawesy wrote:Bang for buk would ve a sc kit as stated but all comes down to budget

Or a backyard turbo build :wink:
TEAM FUNERAL HEARSE!
Only slightly modified, I swear!
User avatar
SH30RB
-stickered-
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 8:32 pm
Location: Sydney
Car: 05 Liberty 3.0R-B wagon
Real name: Simon
Profile URL: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=14766

Next

Return to 3.0R & 3.6R engine specific

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests