dr20t wrote:My intention was not to offend. It was to correct some erroneous assertions and stop people from dissapointment when they don't achieve what they're advised is possible
Swipez wrote:Come on. And if it makes you happy, once my car is tuned, I'll be going to the drags and giving it a good old go, I'm interested in street performance, not particularly drag racing on the strip.
alexeiwoody wrote:Swipez wrote:Come on. And if it makes you happy, once my car is tuned, I'll be going to the drags and giving it a good old go, I'm interested in street performance, not particularly drag racing on the strip.
Do it. It's great fun![]()
When you know what to look for - the 1/4 is a vey good indicator of on street performance, torque and top end power, especially on a manual N/a car.
Housemusic1 wrote:Awesome. I will have to see if my current tuner has done a flex tune. Once the snow is gone, the Raptors are getting welded up, and it will be time for some fun.
alexeiwoody wrote:
Swipez...it's great that you're excited about your H6. It is a great engine and the gen4 is a fantastic platform. I don't think anyone here is trying to claim otherwise.
These numbers you're quoting so religiously about crank power and others...they're just that - "quotes". Not only are they "not quite" proven, as dynos measure power/torque at the hubs/tyres and not at the crank, but some like the "40% more fuel usage" and "300kw at the crank with a supercharger" are wrong. If you don't mind - let's stick to numbers that have been measured reliably and proven many times - 180kwatw.
That is best case scenario with all the bolt ons + full E85 (as measured on a manual, take off about 20kw for an auto) and a considerable amount of $$. Yes, it's a pretty nice daily driver.
That is also the same peak that a bone stock GT gets with a TBE and maybe an cheap TMIC. 180kw on a manual, take off 20kw for the 5eat. Add a fuel pump, headers and E85? Suddenly you're well into 200kwatw+ territory with more torque and power everywhere (except maybe under 2000rpm!) over a similarly modded H6. And it really shows up even on the bum dyno. Funny enough, Matt has quoted his customers 230kwatw on that setup. And then there was one bloke here who made 270kw at the rear (let's allow 10% extra power, so 230-240kw otherwise at all 4) on that setup. Oh and he was on 98. See how dyno figures also don't really solve anything and just create arguments?
If you guys really want to brag about how much power and torque you're making - post up some 1/4 slips. No one can argue with those (and are a lot more exciting to talk about than your crank numbers).
Check out Kiahatsiu's challenge thread. Lots of H6 owners had a go on the 1/4mile. Turns out - all of these "WRX beating" E85 H6s ran the same 1/4 as a stock WRX or worse.
TL:DR version: Enough shit talk, post up some slips.![]()
![]()
nixwrx wrote:Are you on E85 with the supercharger?
vertix wrote:Hey Cliff,
Do you happen to have any dyno sheets before the car was supercharged? with or without e85?
Swipez wrote:
Good stuff Cliffo,
I'm going the exact same route that you went, E85 n/a tune soon with Matt. He uploaded a base tune the other day, soon we'll do the corn juice tune. Then I'll whack the s/c on when the wallet is ready. I just want to ask for some clarification, the dyno sheet you just posted says 98 fuel. Was that reading definitely on 98? And if so, what is your power atw on E85?
Thanks man.
Return to 3.0R & 3.6R engine specific
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests