0-100 times.. any times to back up performance mods??

[NoOzL47]

no idea on 0-100 but i did a 14.95 with a shitty launch and missed 5th

[Woodduck]

3.7 gtech verified

Thats quick!!!

[smythie]

It also has twin huffers

Noozle, for reference, Wheels only managed mid 15's from a 3RB wagon a few years ago. Would have been with half tank of fuel and passenger on board.

[Woodduck]

I pulled 15 seconds flat with 3 people (including me) a full boot and a full tank of fuel. Thats with my V-tune, phat quads and short shifter. This was only my second run, and the road had a slight corner halfway through.

[NoOzL47]

Out of curiosity how was that measured? I'd been keen to see how diff the results from the drags compare to the iPhone app

[jdm rsk]

3.7 gtech verified

Better get the gtech checked that's ferrari times

[smythie]

H6 with two turbos running 11psi. Making 911 GT2 power and torque figures (according to the Pulse dyno). Not inconceivable. BUT I wouldn't take times from any of those G sensor things for gospel. They'd be in the ball park though.

[swingn]

Have found most of those iPhone apps & G meter thingies to be a fair way off the mark... People have been saying their stock EVO's are running sub 5 seconds for 0-100 is just not right

There are some products out there that are more accurate, but they come at a price.

Best way to get accurate times is to hit the drag way... Not to mention it's pretty well the only legal way to do a quarter mile time

[Woodduck]

Out of curiosity how was that measured? I'd been keen to see how diff the results from the drags compare to the iPhone app

That was through my ECUdata scan. Not sure if they are reliable sorce or not???

3.7 gtech verified

Better get the gtech checked that's ferrari times

Thats what I was thinking. I had a wheels mag next to me when i read that, and its half a second quicker than one of the $700K ferraris

[smythie]

Pull out your wheels mag and check a time for an RS6. Should be comparable with what mwboom's car is capable of

[mwboom]

Gday guys

g-tech is pretty accurate when set up correctly. Its not a crap i phone app.
0-80 in 2.3 so a Ferrari, Porsche get hammered up to here.
Having to change gears is where they get better but i guess a $30k transmission will do that and they can do it all day at the track, so the price tag reflects the engineering.

Big power and torque AWD and short gearing 1580kg why is 3.7 so unrealistic?

Anyway its not a dick measuring competition. If you spend big money expect big performance.

cheers

[jdm rsk]

Gday guys

g-tech is pretty accurate when set up correctly. Its not a crap i phone app.
0-80 in 2.3 so a Ferrari, Porsche get hammered up to here.
Having to change gears is where they get better but i guess a $30k transmission will do that and they can do it all day at the track, so the price tag reflects the engineering.

Big power and torque AWD and short gearing 1580kg why is 3.7 so unrealistic?

Anyway its not a dick measuring competition. If you spend big money expect big performance.

cheers

Sorry thaught your car was n/a

[swingn]

Pull out your wheels mag and check a time for an RS6. Should be comparable with what mwboom's car is capable of

RS6 at Compak Attak was running 13.0 - 13.2 consistently down the quarter mile

[massimo.berardinelli]

no idea on 0-100 but i did a 14.95 with a shitty launch and missed 5th

wats donee to yours mate? and how much fuel did you have in the tank?

[mwboom]

Gday guys

g-tech is pretty accurate when set up correctly. Its not a crap i phone app.
0-80 in 2.3 so a Ferrari, Porsche get hammered up to here.
Having to change gears is where they get better but i guess a $30k transmission will do that and they can do it all day at the track, so the price tag reflects the engineering.

Big power and torque AWD and short gearing 1580kg why is 3.7 so unrealistic?

Anyway its not a dick measuring competition. If you spend big money expect big performance.

cheers

Sorry thaught your car was n/a

mmm.. I am the black sheep.. no spot for me to fit