jakey wrote:.... goshgollywingwong
Jack_Keaka wrote:the process of chris getting his parts as follows:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
beachcruiser wrote:Thanks for the quick responses, I'm thinking an overcast day would be good and I'm trying to think of a good location without to much distracting surroundings. I want to show off the 'shiny' without detracting from the picture...
Also thinking I want the whole car in good focus - especially for the 'selling' shots - what kind of aperture would you suggest (I can shot on a tripod so it can be low speed for low light)
Caution wrote:$150 posted. US frequency tho.
tangcla wrote:Something a bit different from me.




Adrian2627 wrote:You've got to be very careful with skate shots. Work with the skaters rather than getting them to do what you think would be good. The skate crowd is the most fickle crowd out there and a touch conceited when it comes to their scene. They'll spot set up shots and write them off very quickly. The second shot you posted, while technically correct, lacks the reality of the move. How he got there is needed to keep the shot real. Skate mags are full of "commercial" shots and they often don't ever get a second look. Skaters look for the art of their sport and how the urban environment has been utilised. Unfortunately I don't have any skate shots on hand to show you but this MTB shot might give you the idea.
Caution wrote:i can back everything you've said^^^ as someone who got into photography through skateboarding with friends.
composition is key... showing obstacles etc but you did a good job Clarence.
few of my flicks.
Jack_Keaka wrote:I feel your over thinking it. No reflection is really ever going detract enough.
Also if it's going on carsales or whatever, just stick it on auto mode and take normal pictures.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests