BL5 Rear wiper conversion

Show off what mods you've done to your car.

Postby AndySTi » Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:19 pm

tangcla wrote:
AndySTi wrote:lol this has been dragging on for waaaaaaayyyyy too long.
But why do I have to take a photo, is it like I have to prove something? not really... I mean, there are plenty of photos of the JDM Legacy with a rear wiper...
soz, guess i was just eager to see! :) It's not everyday you see a lib with a rear-wiper (well in aus, as loweart mentioned) End product looks pretty sweet though ;)
User avatar
AndySTi
 
Posts: 451
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 6:53 pm
Location: Sydney
Car: MY07 LGT TB STI
Real name: Lak

Postby Zoo Tv » Thu Feb 05, 2009 3:32 pm

So how much was it Tangcla? Can you roughly itemise?

i.e. Stalk $140
Glass $...
User avatar
Zoo Tv
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:40 am
Location: Sydney
Car: 2005 MY05 3.0 R-B Sedan

Postby jdm rsk » Thu Feb 05, 2009 3:49 pm

tangcla wrote:
AndySTi wrote:lol this has been dragging on for waaaaaaayyyyy too long.
But why do I have to take a photo, is it like I have to prove something? not really... I mean, there are plenty of photos of the JDM Legacy with a rear wiper...
wow only asked. Won't ask again and you call your self a photographer
User avatar
jdm rsk
formerly legacy rsk
 
Posts: 4026
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:04 am
Location: Sydney, Australia, Kasuga City Fukuoka Japan
Car: MY 11 VW Golf GTI ED35
Real name: Shane

Postby tangcla » Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:11 pm

Zoo Tv wrote:So how much was it Tangcla? Can you roughly itemise?

i.e. Stalk $140
Glass $...
Too much :P close to $1K, and that's before electrician's labour costs.
www.tangcla.com - photography

Canon 5D Mark III x2 | 16-35mm f/2.8L | 24-70mm f/2.8L IS | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
100mm f/2.8L IS macro | 200mm f/2.0L IS | 580EX-II x2 | 430EX-II | PocketWizard TT1/TT5
User avatar
tangcla
 
Posts: 7409
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:47 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Car: B6 Audi S4 (4.2L V8)
Real name: Clarence
Profile URL: http://www.tangcla.com

Postby gumbyy » Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:12 pm

YOWZA! :shock:
:swoon:
User avatar
gumbyy
 
Posts: 1007
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:43 am
Location: Sydney
Car: MY04 GT Sedan (Team Black)
Real name: Vina

Postby tangcla » Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:12 pm

legacy rsk wrote:wow only asked. Won't ask again and you call your self a photographer
I've got a LOT of personal issues going on at the moment. Taking photos of a mod I did on my car is not high on my priority list - hell, I'm not even interested in modding my car as it is.
www.tangcla.com - photography

Canon 5D Mark III x2 | 16-35mm f/2.8L | 24-70mm f/2.8L IS | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
100mm f/2.8L IS macro | 200mm f/2.0L IS | 580EX-II x2 | 430EX-II | PocketWizard TT1/TT5
User avatar
tangcla
 
Posts: 7409
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:47 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Car: B6 Audi S4 (4.2L V8)
Real name: Clarence
Profile URL: http://www.tangcla.com

Postby drndrn » Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:23 pm

Does that wipe the whole rear windscreen or just until its at a right angle?
Diamond Grey 2.5i Heritage
User avatar
drndrn
-stickered-
 
Posts: 1498
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:15 pm
Location: Glen Waverley, Victoria
Car: MY08 Subaru Liberty

Postby GTSPECB STI » Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:28 pm

tangcla wrote:
Zoo Tv wrote:So how much was it Tangcla? Can you roughly itemise?

i.e. Stalk $140
Glass $...
Too much :P close to $1K, and that's before electrician's labour costs.


now you know why Subaru dont put them on Aussie Subarus. Looks really good but not $1000 good.
MY10 Forester XTP
GTSPECB STI
-stickered-
 
Posts: 1836
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:26 pm
Location: Perth

Postby tangcla » Thu Feb 05, 2009 6:07 pm

drndrn wrote:Does that wipe the whole rear windscreen or just until its at a right angle?
It does approx. 135 degree wipe.
www.tangcla.com - photography

Canon 5D Mark III x2 | 16-35mm f/2.8L | 24-70mm f/2.8L IS | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
100mm f/2.8L IS macro | 200mm f/2.0L IS | 580EX-II x2 | 430EX-II | PocketWizard TT1/TT5
User avatar
tangcla
 
Posts: 7409
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:47 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Car: B6 Audi S4 (4.2L V8)
Real name: Clarence
Profile URL: http://www.tangcla.com

Postby tangcla » Thu Feb 05, 2009 6:08 pm

GTSPECB STI wrote:now you know why Subaru dont put them on Aussie Subarus. Looks really good but not $1000 good.
Having said that though, think about the cost rationally... they'd replace the glass with a different one (less $500) and the pump, wiper arm etc. would cost a lot less if it was all mass-produced and integrated. The wiring and water line would also be next to nothing to integrate, I mean it'd be the same as the wagon...
www.tangcla.com - photography

Canon 5D Mark III x2 | 16-35mm f/2.8L | 24-70mm f/2.8L IS | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
100mm f/2.8L IS macro | 200mm f/2.0L IS | 580EX-II x2 | 430EX-II | PocketWizard TT1/TT5
User avatar
tangcla
 
Posts: 7409
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:47 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Car: B6 Audi S4 (4.2L V8)
Real name: Clarence
Profile URL: http://www.tangcla.com

Postby GTSPECB STI » Thu Feb 05, 2009 6:22 pm

tangcla wrote:
GTSPECB STI wrote:now you know why Subaru dont put them on Aussie Subarus. Looks really good but not $1000 good.
Having said that though, think about the cost rationally... they'd replace the glass with a different one (less $500) and the pump, wiper arm etc. would cost a lot less if it was all mass-produced and integrated. The wiring and water line would also be next to nothing to integrate, I mean it'd be the same as the wagon...


must be similar reason to why we get 2.5 ltr single scroll and Japan gets 2.0 ltr twin scroll...not fair or logical but fact none the less. Also maybe it just doesn't rain as much in Australia as Japan.

For that matter why do we get fog lights? In WA they are illegal to run.
MY10 Forester XTP
GTSPECB STI
-stickered-
 
Posts: 1836
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:26 pm
Location: Perth

Postby tangcla » Thu Feb 05, 2009 6:34 pm

GTSPECB STI wrote:For that matter why do we get fog lights? In WA they are illegal to run.
That's Australia's dumb fault. :rolleyes: no idea why foglights would be 'illegal'. Stupid, really. I guess those VZ SS Commodore owners really ruined it for everyone, with their blindingly bright lights. My foglights are projectors and are pointed quite low towards the ground.
www.tangcla.com - photography

Canon 5D Mark III x2 | 16-35mm f/2.8L | 24-70mm f/2.8L IS | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
100mm f/2.8L IS macro | 200mm f/2.0L IS | 580EX-II x2 | 430EX-II | PocketWizard TT1/TT5
User avatar
tangcla
 
Posts: 7409
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:47 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Car: B6 Audi S4 (4.2L V8)
Real name: Clarence
Profile URL: http://www.tangcla.com

Postby jdm rsk » Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:21 pm

GTSPECB STI wrote:
tangcla wrote:
Zoo Tv wrote:So how much was it Tangcla? Can you roughly itemise?

i.e. Stalk $140
Glass $...
Too much :P close to $1K, and that's before electrician's labour costs.


now you know why Subaru dont put them on Aussie Subarus. Looks really good but not $1000 good.
mass production wouldnt cost any where near that amount. they (subaru) dont pay for products like we do. all legacy's in japan have rear wipers, heated & folding wing mirrors, there are other options not available here aslo like heated front windscreen & airpurfier & deodorizer.
Last edited by jdm rsk on Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:43 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
jdm rsk
formerly legacy rsk
 
Posts: 4026
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:04 am
Location: Sydney, Australia, Kasuga City Fukuoka Japan
Car: MY 11 VW Golf GTI ED35
Real name: Shane

Postby swingn » Fri Feb 06, 2009 8:03 am

GTSPECB STI wrote:must be similar reason to why we get 2.5 ltr single scroll and Japan gets 2.0 ltr twin scroll...For that matter why do we get fog lights? In WA they are illegal to run.


Japan emmission laws aren't as strict as they are in other parts of the world. Thus why the US only ever got the 2.5LT in the WRX & Liberty/Legacy.

I think Japan is only now just starting to use the 2.5LT in the Legacy - Started with the S402?

That's actually why Nissan had to discontinue the SR20DET & the RB26DETT... Their new cars would be very popular in please like the US, but those engines are now considered to be "dirty"... Same as Mitsubishi discontinuing their 4G63 EVO motor.
User avatar
swingn
-stickered-
 
Posts: 4163
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: Sydney, NSW
Car: MX5 SE / 911 Turbo
Real name: Matt
Profile URL: www.rtdc.com.au

Postby tangcla » Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:14 pm

If anyone's still following this thread - finally got off my lazy ass and finished plumbing the vacuum (water) lines to the rear wiper. All works well, except the intermittent feature. Need to figure out what the deal with that is, but running it off the one 12V wire off the body control module so far works fine. Just need to manually stop the wiper at the baseline position.

One possibility is that the AUDM Liberties all got the wagon body control module, and the wagon wiper being smaller has a shorter wipe duration.
www.tangcla.com - photography

Canon 5D Mark III x2 | 16-35mm f/2.8L | 24-70mm f/2.8L IS | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
100mm f/2.8L IS macro | 200mm f/2.0L IS | 580EX-II x2 | 430EX-II | PocketWizard TT1/TT5
User avatar
tangcla
 
Posts: 7409
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:47 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Car: B6 Audi S4 (4.2L V8)
Real name: Clarence
Profile URL: http://www.tangcla.com

PreviousNext

Return to Post your mods

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 119 guests