jakey wrote:dr20t wrote: retafddf
yep.
Oh the irony

jakey wrote:dr20t wrote: retafddf
yep.
Jack_Keaka wrote: I like my women like subarus, box explodes and does a head easily.
dr20t wrote:Matt please don't let this descend into one of these tit for tat arguments
And please remove your avcs tables it doesn't achieve anything other than disrepecting your IP - I'm not going to compare tables.
Long and short is it wasnt making power below 4000rpm mate. We had two sessions at insight, 2 at autosport and a couple of road sessions. Surely it would've been enough to figure it out.
And Hakan only decatted that's all he did. That was after the first dyno session in july 2013.
Maybe you can look at why that was happening. Yes exhaust cam being retarded will cause sluggish response down low, but you could've tuned around this with the highly adjustable exhaust avcs I have. Infact the way I've done it now gets the best of both worlds. Compressor surge in 4th at 3700rpm tells you something. And you're wrong about the overlap.
Interesting also that I've seen and heard you suggest a retarded static exhaust cam setup on this and other forums before- which tells me you actually saw value in the retarded exhaust am I wrong? And if so that means you can optimise the tune for the retafddf exhaust.
Anyway I do appreciate all the stuff we've discussed and learnt over the years. You just shit me with your above comment when you trivialized the fact that it was so easy to make power down low now when I was sweating on this same issue for a while.
As I've always said, you do know alot, but I don't think you ever really optimised my dual avcs setup.
Mick
JMlegacy wrote:well, I've been trying for ages. Most i got to was 2400 on my poor fuel. I'm running some octane booster now so I'll revisit that today.
JMlegacy wrote:Most boost i saw was 5 psi. Nothing more. Car would not past 2600 rpm.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests